Yeehaw. I just got a cease-and-desist letter from an entity that calls itself “Dixona Transport.”
I am evaluating my options as we speak.
Addendum: Here is the letter:
I am writing to inform you that “Dixona” is a registered trademark of Dixona Transport, a Limited Liability Corporation in the State of Florida, with all rights reserved. Your web-site makes enough references to “Dixona” to appear first on a search using Google or Yahoo and this could cause potential customers to confuse an affiliation between your site and my company.
I respectfully ask that you remove all references to “Dixona” from your site. If you do not I will contact the following organizations about taking your site down or obtaining your identity to take you to court: Domains by Proxy your domain host, GoDaddy.com its parent company, and EV1Servers your site host. I will also consider taking other actions such as finding any other copyright or trademark violations on your site and contacting the holders of those copyrights or trademarks.
I appreciate your cooperation on this matter,
President, Dixona Transport
[street address withheld]
St. Petersburg, FL 33703
Note: The name of the state has been changed from Dixona to Delosa.
About the Author
please enter your email address on this page.
"Okay, so we invented viable and fully functional jetpacks, what do we do now?"
Japan : "SAMOURAI FIGHTS!!!" pic.twitter.com/X8dy5XTN23
— Karen-chan 🍂 (@Fire_Sister_Bee) March 24, 2018
Prevailing theory assumes that people enforce norms in order to pressure others to act in ways that they approve. Yet there are numerous examples of “unpopular norms” in which people compel each other to do things that they privately disapprove. While peer sanctioning suggests a ready explanation for why people conform to unpopular norms, it is harder to understand why they would enforce a norm they privately oppose. The authors argue that people enforce unpopular norms to show that they have complied out of genuine conviction and not because of social pressure. They use laboratory experiments to demonstrate this “false enforcement” in the context of a wine tasting and an academic text evaluation. Both studies find that participants who conformed to a norm due to social pressure then falsely enforced the norm by publicly criticizing a lone deviant. A third study shows that enforcement of a norm effectively signals the enforcer’s genuine support for the norm. These results
demonstrate the potential for a vicious cycle in which perceived pressures to conform to and falsely enforce an unpopular norm re-inforce one another.
Several recent studies have investigated the consequences of racial intermarriage for marital stability. None of these studies properly control for first-order racial differences in divorce risk, therefore failing to appropriately identify the effect of intermarriage. Our article builds on an earlier generation of studies to develop a model that appropriately identifies the consequences of crossing racial boundaries in matrimony. We analyze the 1995 and 2002 National Survey of Family Growth using a parametr
If there is one thing in that statement which I would take issue with, it is Mallon’s overly optimistic belief that the new policy is “well-meaning”.
That’s because anyone who has spent any time in an Irish hospital over the last few years will have seen the smoking ban enforced in draconian and nasty ways which are simply punitive and judgmental.
Even those who have been fortunate enough to stay away from hospitals in that time can see the results of such bans.
Drive by the Mater on any rainy day, for instance, and you will see patients huddled together in their dressing gowns, exposed to the elements as they take a break from the drudgery of hospital life. This, apparently, is healthier than allowing the patients an enclosed area – which they used to have – where they could smoke without bothering anyone else and, perhaps, not get soaked to the bone at the same time.
People smoke in hospitals for a variety of reasons, and one which is never considered by the authorities is that it is actually good for their head.
Certainly, when my father spent a few years in and out of James’s hospital with the terminal, non-smoking related disease which would ultimately kill him, he measured the days by increments of when he’d go out for a smoke. It broke the endless monotony of living on a ward and, like many other long-term patients, he was determined to not become a ‘lifer’, one of those lost, institutionalised souls who simply lie in bed all day staring at the ceiling.
One might be forgiven for believing that this is more about sin and repentance than concern for the welfare of the sinners.
- on Bo Burnham’s “Country Song (Pandering)” I've finished this report and that I absolutely need more! I believe myself to be a r…
- on Bo Burnham’s “Country Song (Pandering)” I just had my iphone 5s screen repaired here, unbelievably fast! He did it right in f…
- on Deseretian Toker Chic My neighbor did a similar thing. His girlfriend said that if he'd start smoking and k…
- on SMV, MMV Thanks for sharing your thoughts! There are, nevertheless, some disadvantages when it…
- on The Peculiarities of Maris Crane Thank you for sharing for this advice, it may be helpful for a person to use it for w…
- on Put Your Hand Inside the Puppet Head Thanks for your article. Hunting accurate information is one of the biggest issues fo…
- on Weak, But Aggressive Thank you for sharing your ideas!
- on A Degree In Snobbery From DeVry I spent a couple of minutes studying and checking the facts. Everything is clear and…
Greetings from Stonebridge a fictitious city in a fictitious state located in a tri-state area in the interior Mid-Atlantic region. We're in western Queenland, which is really a state unto itself, and not to be confused with Queensland in Australia.
Nothing written on this site should be taken as strictly true, though if the author were making it all up rest assured the main character and his life would be a lot less unremarkable.