Is Internet {stuff} worse than crack? I find it interesting how crack becomes the benchmark for such things. As to the question, the Internet certainly makes it easier to take {stuff}ography into excess. Hit Coffee reader David Alexander remains the strongest anti-{stuff} case study I have ever seen.

On the other hand, it may prevent rape. This presents some uncomfortable questions with regard to child {stuff}. The ostensible reason against it is that it requires minors to partake, but we have to admit that’s only part of the reason. The other part is that we consider suck things sick. However, what do we do if digitally produced, widely available erotic pictures of eight year olds helps satiate pedophiles and prevents them from acting on their instincts and prevents them from obtaining {stuff}ography that involved the exploitation of minors… what then? Others, though, argue that it generally desensitizes us to rape as a criminal offense and so the same effect would apply to minors (presumably).

Charlie Sheen has never been a paragon of adult behavior, but it’s still sad to watch the descent. The producers of Two and a Half Men are looking at the positive, though at some point jail time may seriously get in the way of production. It’s interesting when you look at Sheen and his brother Emilio Estevez. Estevez has a couple of kids out of wedlock and is a product of Hollywood, but by and large seems to be a decent enough guy despite coming up in the same atmosphere that Charlie did.

If you major in English, like Vin Diesel did, you are embracing a life of uncertainty.

Rapper Ice Cube, unlike Vin Diesel, studied architectural design, and unlike Charlie Sheen and despite his anti-establishmentarianism appears to have lead a rather traditional life with four kids by a wife of nearly twenty years.

Still waiting for that {stuff}-only domain name. Some people think it’s stupid because the {stuff}-makers won’t abide by it. Quite the contrary, I think the biggest danger is that a lot of sites that have nothing to do with {stuff}ography are going to have a pretty straightforward way to goad people to their sites. Of course, the two are not mutually exclusive.

The Chinese have an interesting approach to naming streets.


Category: Newsroom

About the Author


6 Responses to Linkluster XXX

  1. Peter says:

    I can’t understand why anyone pays for Internet {stuff} when You{stuff}.com has enough {stuff} videos to last a thousand lifetimes.

  2. David Alexander says:

    I can’t understand why anyone pays for Internet {stuff} when You{stuff}.com has enough {stuff} videos to last a thousand lifetimes.

    Sometimes, it’s out of habit or to support a particular website or studio & director. In my case, it’s because it’s much easier to get exactly what I want when I pay instead of being limited to third rate streams of stuff that may not interest me.

    Hit Coffee reader David Alexander remains the strongest anti-{stuff} case study I have ever seen.

    What’s wrong with enjoying porn? 🙂

  3. Peter says:

    Not only is it free, but You{stuff}.com is divided into categories that cover every fetish you’ve ever heard of, and some fetishes you’ll wish you never heard of.

    Heck, they even have a category for my, er, preference.

  4. Mike Hunt says:

    Is Internet {stuff} worse than crack?

    I would argue that the internet itself is worse than crack.

    @David Alexander

    I have no idea how realistic your David Alexander persona is, but he is a loser.

  5. Kirk says:

    I have no idea how realistic your David Alexander persona is, but he is a loser.

    If perusing porn makes one a loser, DA is certainly in good company. As for the article arguing against porn, I find it ridiculous as their complaint is that masturbating releases “natural endorphins” that can be addictive.

    So does jogging.

  6. Kirk says:

    Regarding the “English Majors” article: the professor seems to be only providing a laundry list of reasons to study the field. I’ve seen defenses of the field like this one before, and they’re all similar in that they’re made by people who have never worked outside of academe, and who have a vested financial interest in promoting the field.

    And it was really kind of pathetic for him to include celebrities in it, as they’re living one-in-a-million type lives. (Dolph Lundgren has a master’s in chem. eng. Are we going to include that in discussions about “why to study chemical engineering”?)

    My degree is essentially in English. I guess I’m glad I went through with it, but it does seem to be a useless piece of paper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

If you are interested in subscribing to new post notifications,
please enter your email address on this page.