Fair point. My guess is, though, that they’re not much more likely to get it wrong post-smoking than pre-smoking. Which is to say, if they underestimate calories by 20% after smoking, they probably underestimated their previous count, too, by a similar amount.
It is a major weakness of this study that it relied on subjects’ self-reported food consumption.
Fair point. My guess is, though, that they’re not much more likely to get it wrong post-smoking than pre-smoking. Which is to say, if they underestimate calories by 20% after smoking, they probably underestimated their previous count, too, by a similar amount.
I could be wrong, though.