James thinks I need therapy, on account of my affection for Brutalist architecture.
Which got me thinking… why do I like it? It’s not like I am particularly an architectural critic. I’m not even sure it falls under the category of “Having an opinion to have an opinion,” which I sometimes do.
My first thought was comic books, which explains my aesthetic tastes in some things (like solid colors over patterns). That would explain my appreciation of gothic architecture, for example. But if brutalist architecture is common in comic books the same way that gothic architecture often is, I can’t think of any examples.
But I like it for its simplicity, raw utilitarianism. Yet I don’t have the same fondness for the glass boxes that take up skylines (I don’t dislike them, either, but it’s not the same). But my instinct is along the lines of “I like it because that’s how government buildings are supposed to look.” Why do I think that?
I think it’s because of my dad.
My father worked at a sprawling government installation that more or less defines the area of the suburbs where I was raised. I will call it Livingston AFB. And he actually worked on the base, as opposed to across the street where my brother does. Which meant that when I went to see him at work, I would go onto the base with all of its buildings that were… brutalist. Or something indistinguishable to it, to my eye.
And of course my father was awesome, the government agency he worked for was awesome, and all that jazz. Better yet, it was in the pre-9/11 days when you had a degree of free access to it (I think the sticker on our cars were required), and driving around it was interesting with all of the planes and other aircraft they had on display. And, of course, it was the very symbol of the federal government where I grew up.
So other designs that are so-called “nice looking” and a hoity-toity “non-depressing” and “sort of looks oppressive” carry no truck with me.
And of course, once you like something and dislike something, you come up with more reason to like or dislike it. Which is probably where my “honesty in architecture” comes from. And my vague belief that government facilities shouldn’t look nice. They should be there, and tolerable. Like the government! Or something.
About the Author
7 Responses to My Affection for Brutalist Architecture
Leave a Reply
please enter your email address on this page.
USang at Onionswamp is known for its brutalist architecture, and about 20 years ago, or earlier, USang embarked on a (still ongoing) effort to undo the most brutal aspects of it. In my mind, the undoing is an improvement, but the brutalism is still there and still, in my opinion, regrettable. I don´t think you necessarily need therapy, but otherwise, I respectfully agree with James.
I do tend to think government buildings should be inviting, especially because when people who don´t work there go there, they go there because they have to. Why not treat them to a bit of good aesthetics. (I realize “good” is in the eye of the beholder….and that´s part of where our difference of opinion lies….so on some level, I´m just saying I like something different and wish people would adopt my views.)
I also tend to think of brutalism as totalitarian, as a way to suppress the spirit. But that´s also wrapped up in my averse reaction to USang at Onionswamp in general, so maybe my aesthetic preferences are overdetermined.
I did a residency at UofI Chicago where the entire east campus is brutalist design by Walter Netsch. I found it unpleasant, as did most of my peers.
Didn’t know you were that kind of doc, doc.
Dr. Preacher, let me introduce you to Mr. Choir. Ditto to what you said.
I like it for its simplicity, raw utilitarianism. Yet I don’t have the same fondness for the glass boxes that take up skylines (I don’t dislike them, either, but it’s not the same).
And, ironically, I much prefer the glass box of modernist architecture. While I don’t love it, and while I’m glad architecture has moved out of its minimalist, low cost, “true to the materials” phase, I do like some minimalism as an aesthetic, whereas I almost never find examples of brutalism that I like as an aesthetic.
“… because that’s how government buildings are supposed to look.”
Not just honesty in materials, but honesty in purpose. 😉
Honesty all the way around, man.
I want my buildings to lie to me!