Blog Archives
This remains untrue, and insisting that it is over and over again doesn’t make the new one better. (It may be good! I haven’t seen it yet. I don’t even think it will be terrible.)
How facial recognition may introduce us to our doppelgangers.
Well, this is a long-time coming!
Businesses are coming up with an ingenuous way to get more employees: raising wages.
Kevin Williamson explains how higher wages make Buc-ee’s great, but that you can’t universalize from their experience. {Related}
Congratulations, Tobacco Control, your dishonesty is working.
According to some research, being who are overweight have less grey and white matter in the brain, leading them to make poorer food choices. I’m not sure I like where this goes.
Artificial light, and the loss of the light-dark cycle, may be making us sick.
Family-friendly policies, such as childcare and family leave, may not do much to increase fertility rates, but they may have the non-trivial effect of making parents happier.
Sarah Grant looks at coding boot camps, and attempts to ascertain their effectiveness for loan purposes.
Isochronic maps are GoogleMaps before there was GoogleMap. Sorta.
Alan Sepinwall goes to bat for self-contained television episodes.
Book of Tamara asks What is a University?
Unsurprisingly, I am on Team Separate Bedrooms. Spousal benefits come with being married.
How other countries see American food and throw “American” parties. And a Mexican July Fourth!
One of the theories that’s been going around Twitter since the tide started to turn in the coup in Turkey is that it was a false-flag operation. This has been a particularly popular theory on the right, but I’ve seen it elsewhere.
The crux is that if Erdogan wanted to consolidate power, he needs a pretext. A coup would provide the pretext. So something something, failed coup, more power for Erdogan!
Even if we grant that Erdogan is the villain that his critics believe (it’s not a stretch), it’s difficult to state how terrible a plan this would be. And it suggests a misunderstanding of the relationship between the President and the military. In the US, we have almost complete civilian control. Which is to say that the military is indisputably below the president in the hierarchy of power. The President is the Commander-in-Chief. This is one of those things that you learn in school while you’re going through, but you don’t necessarily see the importance of until cases like this arise.
For the most part, military action in Turkey seems to occur when there is agreement between the military and the President. The military considers itself answerable not to the president, or democracy. but to the founding spirit of Turkey or somesuch. Basically, it’s like how our military takes an oath the Constitution that means obeying the orders of the president, except in their case it doesn’t exactly mean obeying the orders of the president.
There are some rather zero-sum power dynamics involved here, though. Which is to say that the more powerful the military is, the less powerful the military is (and vice-versa). Which means that to pull this off, Erdogan would have to not only send its troops to die, but convince leavers to engage in a stage show that would, in the end, either leave them dead or in a best case less powerful. It’s not at all clear why the military would do this.
Further, if they are going to put themselves out there, they’re likely going to try to win because they don’t like the president. If their backs were against the wall and they had do to something, they might I guess, but at any point in the process they might actually just change their mind and go ahead and try for the coup. Which represents a risk for Erdogan that it seems very stupid to take.
All of this is further the long way around to meeting its goal. If Erdogan wants to create a crisis to consolidate power, all he really needs to do is stage an assassination attempt. Which itself is risky, but not as risky. It involved far fewer people. The risk of exposure is much lighter. You’re not putting yourself in a position that if the tide turns a particular way, they can go ahead and seize control of the government.
Or put another way, “Hey you, person who hates me, could you roll your tanks into Ankara as a part of a play-show that will give me the power to defeat you?” is not a good plan. It is a stupid one, and Erdogan isn’t stupid.
Hit Coffee has always gone “blog style” by showing most or usually all of posts, in succession. Ordinary Times goes more “magazine style” with an image and summary and you have to click on the item to read the content. I have always preferred the former (as a reader) because you can just keep reading without clicking. However, the latter makes it easier to navigate past posts you aren’t interested in (like Linkluster, or the tweetstorms).
Linkluster is about to go through a revision. Linkluster 500 may be the last one in this format. Even if it’s not, a change is probably coming. Likely, there will be a box sort of like Linkage on OT where a lot of these posts are handled. I’m still deciding how it’s going to go.
But with regard to blog style vs magazine style, do you all have a real preference one way or the other? Would you like me to switch over to a magazine style? Or would you like me to be more aggressive about clipping long articles so for them you have to click “more” but otherwise keeping it the way it is? Or are you fine with the way it is?
Interpol chief Ronald Noble is surprisingly (to me) uncritical of the ramifications of an armed society.
The health minister of Queensland (the real one, in Australia) is open to the idea of a lifetime smoking ban for young people.
Contra Eberspacher, I don’t worry about elitism taking over the Democratic Party. I am a bit worried about whatever the complete opposite of provincialism is, however.
Reihan Salam argues that maybe the relationship between anti-immigration sentiment and racism is there but not as simple as we make it out to be.
The ACLU and a lot of Texas conservatives agree, this law sucks.
Thanks to a court ruling, it is now a federal crime to share your Netflix password. This sort of seems like something that will be rather selectively enforced. {see comments}
According to the Manhattan Institute, maybe we aren’t moving less for opportunity so much as moving differently.
Jennifer Lawrence was removed from Hunger Games posters to avoid offending some religious Israelis.
Oil crash or no, Texas unemployment rates remain low.
Cracked’s Robert Evans read every every issue of Daesh’s magazine, and reports seven things he learned.
According to an analysis out of Canada, there is, alas, no substitute for live lectures in college.
That’s… one long eel they found in Austin.
Scandinavia, the home of statist individualism…
Rome is importing falcons from Texas to hunt starlings.
Alan Moore encourages new writers to self-publish.
Take some free classes from Yale!
Let me tell you the story of Casey and a Skylar. Casey and Skylar met and were immediately smitten with one another. They wanted very badly to be together. The problem is that Casey and Skylar were already with someone else. So what could they do? Well, they did some wrong things. Or they didn’t but wanted to. They felt lust in their heart. Bad stuff. They talked of getting out of their relationships and riding off into the sunset together.
Then, one day Casey finally bit the bullet and told es significant other that e wanted out of their relationship. Casey wanted to move things forward because something needed to give. Skylar would do the same when the time was right. Except that Skylar didn’t and instead drug es feet. This make Casey very needy and insecure, and Skylar began to lose respect. When it was all said and done, Skylar and Casey did not end up together. Skylar stayed with es significant other. Or worse yet, when Skylar did leave es significant other, e left them for some person who wasn’t even in the picture.
Casey was left alone and humiliated. Skylar did fine.
I’ve known multiple Caseys and Skylars over the years. Sometimes Casey is the boy and Skylar is the girl, sometimes it’s the other way around. But the person who jumps first often finds themselves floating in a void of insecurity humiliation.
The moral of the story is that unless Donald Trump offers Pence a spot on the ticket for real before the deadline tomorrow, Pence should resolve to run for re-election as the Governor of Indiana and let Trump pick someone else.
When Gundam needed a city to smash up, they chose… Edmonton, Alberta.
I… uhhh… yeah, that’s a toilet.
I sometimes wonder if any city can ever keep its conservative character as it grows. If Calgary is any indication, the answer appears to be no.
Japanese politicians do campaign posters differently than American ones do.
Well this is fun. What else can we ban by looking at? Maybe the fetus at different stages of development?
Referring to President Obama as “Barry” is rude, but it’s not an affront to civil rights and Peter Daou’s attempts to make it won is not helpful.
Matthias Shapiro talks of living on the food stamp diet, and presents how he managed it.
Well this kind of sucks. When I don’t mind risking Chinese counterfeits I go to eBay. I go to Amazon specifically when I don’t want to risk it.
It’s really interesting that France is one of two countries where fear of crime is an issue for less than half of the population, given the Paris Attacks. (Which, I know, were not carried out by refugees, but demonstrated holes in the process all the same.)
I appreciate the thought here, but as a knuckle-dragging American I am vaguely disconcerted by the word “instructs.”
Maybe it’s not soda and salty/sweet snacks after all.
If it has indeed begun, I fear it’s the beginning of an unhappy story.
Justin Fox explains how Chinese students saved our colleges. There has been some tension with the international students, but their money is green.
Helen Andrews argues that the meritocracy is so obvious, that it’s really hard to question. Even if (maybe especially if) it turns into the aristocracy it ostensibly replaced.
Richard Reeves of the Brookings institute has an interesting piece on partisan affiliation and premarital cohabitation. It gives me hope that there is more resistance to the idea among young Republicans than I thought.
This is presented a quirky Japanese thing when it comes up, but I think rent-a-friend is a neat idea.
David Cameron announced his resignation today, to make room for Prime Minister Theresa May. He seemed really quite chipper about it:
Wow, Cameron announces his resignation as prime minister, then walks back inside *singing* while still mic'd: pic.twitter.com/wb4adNcCnk
— (((Yair Rosenberg))) (@Yair_Rosenberg) July 11, 2016
(If you can’t listen, you can hear him whistling as he enters.)
As said in the title, tough, this is not a post about Brexit. This is a post about Cameron’s soon-to-be former residence, 10 Downing Street. It is one of my head of government houses ever. Why? Because of the standard picture:
This picture makes it look so… quaint. One of the leaders of the free world lives in what looks like a townhouse. You’ve got an entrance with a little lamp overhead. You have those windows where the Prime Minister of their spouse can peek through and see who is at the door. You have the 10 labeled, just to make sure the delivery guy doesn’t deliver the package to 8 or 12 Downing Street by mistake.
It’s really quite marvelous.
Of course, in reality 10 Downing Street is really quite expansive. And rather than being next to 8 and 12 Downing, it’s next to 9 (where the Chief Whip lives) and 11 (where the Chancellor lives).
And security there is a bigger deal than it first appears. There was an attack by the IRA in 1991, and since then they’ve done some safe-guarding.
Even so, I just love the idea of a prime minister living in a nice, snug townhome.
No. GOP is not racist. Trump isn't a racist.
Black Lives Matter? RACIST.
Al Sharpton? RACIST.
Democrats? RACIST https://t.co/UcnWgQnFkB— Lee Stranahan (@stranahan) March 8, 2016
If you throw a rock at a group of #BlackLivesProtestors, you'll hit a black racist.
So if you do, throw it hard. https://t.co/87OQt6U0x6
— Lee Stranahan (@stranahan) March 30, 2016
(H/T Almaqah)
Even before it came out that he probably wasn’t even gay, Walter Olson was not happy with the “self-loathing” explanation for the Orlando killer. He’s also less than jazzed about BLM shutting down a gay pride parade in Canada.
It turns out that smokers are less than interested in being props in someone else’s morality play.
I can definitely understand that there are safety concerns with this device, but as long as nutritionists are recommending diet and exercise I don’t want to hear arguments about efficacy.
A moral dilemma for pro-lifers: The Texas abortion laws recently struck down by the courts increased second-trimester abortions, but reduced abortions overall.
Megan McArdle argues that, at the end of the day, we should treat rape like other crimes.
Hannah Ewens talks about taking grown men’s virginity. I remember one girl I flirted with who seemed to lose interest in me when she found out I wasn’t a virgin. (Note: Unlike this person Ewens did not exactly seek them out.)
As oil prices remain low, some oil companies are wanting to resort to protectionism.
In between the left’s multiculturalism and the right’s nativism, Michael Lind purports to offer a better way.
Razib Khan maps out the great human disruptions.
Matthew Yglesias explains how a seemingly small change in trade policy may have demolished manufacturing employment in the United States.
Ahhh, but can we put a bomb on it?
A paper alleging fracking contamination of drinking water has been retracted.
Pokemon Go! (Find a dead body.) Pity that Law & Order (Prime) isn’t still around, because they always put so much thought into how the dead bodies are found.
Matthew Parris explains that now that he knows his country a little bit better, he likes it a little bit less. He makes some decent points, but the notion that an objective should be abandoned on the basis of who one’s allies are leaves nobody able to advocate for anything. It is usually the lofty point of view of those whose less savory allies cannot be attacked without accusations of racism.
This sounds interesting, but I’m already pretty backlogged on my audiobook queue.
Some rapid thoughts on very interesting @samtanenhaus in NYT mag, “How Trump Can Save the GOP” https://t.co/GuDyrrcSVy …
— David Frum (@davidfrum) July 9, 2016
1) In longest perspective, Trump’s role in US politics may be compared to that of William Jennings Bryan in 1896
— David Frum (@davidfrum) July 9, 2016
2) Bryan, like Trump, won a presidential nomination as tribune for a once dominant, now fading, group: small farmers; white working class
— David Frum (@davidfrum) July 9, 2016